Koons & Siegel v. Platkin Cases Heard En Banc at 3rd Circuit
The 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals heard en banc arguments on Feb. 11, 2026. The likely outcome? Evisceration of New Jersey's law.
The 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals heard en banc arguments on Feb. 11, 2026. The likely outcome? Evisceration of New Jersey's law.
Adamiak, who at the time was an active-duty Navy E-6, was arrested and charged by the ATF during the height of the Biden Administration’s war on guns.
Lauren Snyder and AOR attorney Joey Hamby join Charlie to discuss Second Amendment activism, self-defense realities, and why every armed citizen must be legally prepared before carrying.
Virginia’s proposed $500 suppressor tax has been unanimously tabled in committee. Suppressor advocates say coordinated testimony and grassroots pressure stopped the measure—for now. The post Pro-Rights Groups Manage To Scuttle Virginia’s Proposed $500 Suppressor Tax appeared first on The Tr...
Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier is challenging a decades-old law restricting firearm carry for 18- to 20-year-olds, arguing that constitutional rights don’t hinge on age once adulthood is reached. The post Florida AG James Uthmeier Shows What Constitutional Backbone Looks Like appeared ...
During a House Judiciary hearing, AG Pam Bondi declined to justify why NFA registration remains in place after the suppressor tax was reduced to zero—fueling criticism from gun-rights advocates. The post Congressman Calls Out AG Bondi Over DOJ’s Defense Of NFA Registration Requirements appear...
The ATF rejected multiple Form 1 applications over applicants’ stated Second Amendment motivations—then quietly reversed the denials after public backlash. The post ATF Approves NFA Applications Previously Denied For Answers Citing ‘God-Given Rights’ appeared first on The Truth About Guns.
The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) has quietly built what amounts to a backdoor gun registry — in violation of federal law.
The court upheld the District Court of New Jersey's decision to dismiss with prejudice all constitutional challenges to a state law that criminalizes the distribution of certain digital instructions or code that can be used to 3D-print firearms to unlicensed individuals.
When was the last time anyone read a pro-Second Amendment editorial, representing the newspaper’s position, in the WaPo...which told its readers that “shall not be infringed” means exactly what it says?